
Navigate – JTJB Shipping & Trade Publication Volume 2
JTJB LLP is proud to present the latest issue of Navigate, our dedicated publication offering timely insights into the shipping and international trade industry. In this volume, we explore key

JTJB LLP is proud to present the latest issue of Navigate, our dedicated publication offering timely insights into the shipping and international trade industry. In this volume, we explore key

1 August 2025 The Court of Appeal’s decision in Yit Chee Wah v Inner Mongolia Huomei-Hongjun Aluminium Electricity Co, Ltd [2025] SGCA 27 marks a significant development in insolvency law.

1 August 2025 The Transport Sector (Critical Firms) Act 2024 (“Act”) is a legislation that aims to enhance the resilience of key firms in the air, land, and sea transport

31 July 2025 The Maritime and Shipping Industry is entering unprecedented times. On 2 April 2025, the 47th President of the United States of America, Donald J Trump, announced sweeping

8 July 2025 On 10th October 2024, we published a Postscript to an article published on 20th June 2023 titled “DIRECTORS BeAWARE”. The first article discussed the case of BIT

In this case, a dispute arose when the Claimant (an Iranian registered company) who was the registered owner of the “Shahraz” collided with the “Tina I” on 22 November 2020.

In the fast-moving world of international trade, shippers sometimes resort to issuing letters of indemnity to shipowners in lieu of presenting the original bills of lading (“OBLs”) for the discharge

Our global network of lawyers aren’t just great at legal advice! With travel season around the corner, we have put together a special guide to some of our favourite things

JTJB is pleased to introduce the inaugural volume of Navigate, a publication dedicated to delivering the latest updates and developments in the shipping and international trade industry. In this volume

On 20th June 2023, we published an article titled “DIRECTORS BeAWARE”. That article discussed the case of BIT Baltic Investment & Trading Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) v Wee See

国际商事仲裁依照仲裁机构的参与程度一般可以分为两种形式,临时仲裁和机构仲裁。临时仲裁是19世纪中叶机构仲裁出现以前唯一的国际商事仲裁组织形式,具有更加久远的历史,也具有自由度更高等在内的各种特点和优势。在机构仲裁迅速发展的背景下,临时仲裁仍具有强大的生命力,特别是在国际海事纠纷处理方面,临时仲裁仍是主流。但是,长久以来,在中国大陆(仅为本文之目的,后文如提到中国,仅包括中国大陆,不包括中国香港特别行政区、中国澳门特别行政区和中国台湾省),临时仲裁并未获得法律层面的认可。然而,随着经济全球化的发展和中国对外开放的加快,临时仲裁制度在中国的确立和发展已成为必然趋势。 International commercial arbitration can generally be divided into two forms based on the extent of arbitration institution involvement: ad hoc arbitration and institutional arbitration. Ad hoc arbitration, which existed

In the recent case of Vallianz Shipbuilding & Engineering Pte Ltd v Owner of the vessel “ECO SPARK”, [2023] SGHC 353, the High Court of Singapore was faced with the
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP
Advocates & Solicitors
A
168 Robinson Road
#18-02 Capital Tower
Singapore 068912